Temper has long been Roy's worst enemy

posted by Dave Stubbs at 6h45 EST on Mar 26


0roy.jpg

Patrick Roy takes a breather in the Canadiens net during a 1990s game.
Denis Brodeur, NHLI via Getty Images

Patrick Roy's trademark as a player was a fiery competitiveness, but it hasn't always served him well.

Roy has found himself in the midst of another firestorm as a result of a brawl that erupted during Saturday's Quebec Major Junior Hockey League playoff game between his Quebec Remparts and the Chicoutimi Sagueneens.

Roy's son, Jonathan, was at the centre of attention. The Remparts' backup goalie became a YouTube star for his one-sided attack on Chicoutimi goaltender Robbie Nadeau, who absorbed a beating with the resignation of an early Christian martyr.

Yesterday, the QMJHL handed down its discipline in the case. Among it: Roy was suspended five games, his son banned seven games, and both teams were fined $4,000.

Pat Hickey comments on the case here. Also: a video of the incident, read The Gazette's editorial, Hickey's story from last night's 6-1 Remparts victory and Mike Boone's thoughts from Monday.

Finally: a package in French from today's Journal de Montréal.




StumbleUpon

Comments

[Jump to comment form]

Roy was a great goalie.I've seen that man carry our whole team on his back many nights and prove himself a hero to most.On the ice he was a Canadien icon.on the ice. Off the ice the man is a vile human being.His self centered and arogance is enough to turn stomaches.There's no class in this human being.He thinks he's above all.The whole Esposito thing,his wife and the young goalie for the Wild Cats(who actually idolized this jerk)are just examples of that.

Spartan117's picture
I love Roy

I'll check the clip out at home(can't see it here)....doesn't change a thing to me though....even if he did send his kid for a fight that is not that big of an offense or there would be no coaches left from Bantam all-star up. The NOD lol???Sounds like a Seinfeld episode. Roy went and challenged goalies ...they answered the bell....never have I seen a goalie turtle like that before in my life. Should Jonathan have not fought if the other guy didn't want to ....yes.....should someone take a run at Jonathan next time they play...yes.....should that end it.....yes. That is hockey folks.....watch curling then if you don't like it. This was a bad incident but the only real guilty party ifs Jonathan not Patrick. Is sending a goon out for a shift after an ugly incident not the same thing......or it is excused without The NOD.

Maybe he just did not want to fight, crap even guys in the nhl turtle, the fault lies with the one throwing the punches, not the one getting pummeled.

Exactly my point....Jonathan ...not Patrick threw punches. If I did everything people told me to do in this life I would have taken a few long walks off short piers and wouldn't be here to rant like I do. I am not blaming the guy for turtling...I am just saying it contributed along with the last name of the other party to blowing this out of proportion.

I see you point and whole heatedly agree, if the player was name Guy Boisvert, and played for someone who doesn't have the history that Roy does, this would have been laid to rest long ago.

And I believe someone else did skate over to start a fight with Roy....much like the Emery vs Miller non scrap in the NHL where Andrew Peters jumped in. I don't think anyone has stripped any future honours from Bryan Murray or Lindy Ruff for their roles in that fiasco.

sidhu's picture
I love seeing the blue baseboards from the old Forum. Bring them back! If the league has a rule, exempt the Habs from it!

Chuck's picture
The league does indeed have a rule saying that the kicker boards must be light yellow in colour. You're right, though. The blue did add a certain personality to the place, espcecially considering it's the team's primary colour. If I remember rightly, the Joe in Detroit also had blue boards. And Le Colisee in Quebec, for that matter. . . . ______________________________________ "All bow down before the Komisaurus Rex!"

The M's picture
Jonathan Roy sucks. No really, he's one of the worst goalies in the Q. I guess the shoes he has to fill are rather large....

TommyB's picture
[ Yawn ]

Yawn!!! stop that Tommy don't you know they are contagious.

cautiousoptimist's picture
Sometimes this happens? Sometimes you send your son to charge the length of the ice, shoving a ref along the way, to jump some poor unsuspecting goalie standing in his crease, rip off his mask and pummel his face in until he's reduced to curling up in a ball on the ice without ever having thrown a punch, then give the crowd a two-handed one-finger salute before skating off the ice? Really? That happens sometimes? Dude, remind me never to play hockey with you. Seven games is a joke, and a slap in the face of justice - still better than the flurry of punches that the other goalie got, just for wearing the wrong colour uniform. The guy should be facing criminal charges for that. www.flickeringpictures.com - not a hockey site, but still kinda neat

cautiousoptimist's picture
Of course it happens. I'm saying that it shouldn't, and that there should be consequences. www.flickeringpictures.com - not a hockey site, but still kinda neat

The Teacher's picture
Unsuspecting? really? lol, what was he looking at then? All he had to do was hold his blocker and stick up...if he was not suspecting a fight, then he needs to get a new day job. "Give the Habs a 5 minute standing ovation at the end of the last game of the season against the Leafs (winning OR losing)" "Are the Habs ready to pay the Price?"

cautiousoptimist's picture
Okay, maybe "unsuspecting" isn't the right word. Maybe better to say he was minding his own business. But although there's a place for fights and fighters in hockey, not every player has to do it. It couldn't be clearer that this kid didn't want to fight, and the seven-game suspension is a joke. As for raising his stick, the only way it would have helped him was if he swung it like a baseball bat - Roy Jr was going to jump him no matter what. www.flickeringpictures.com - not a hockey site, but still kinda neat

A little irony , Ex Quebec Rampart and entertainer Roch Voisin turned 45 today and when Voisin played for the Ramparts Commish Gilles Courteau was the GM.

Another Habs win can't come fast enough, getting tired of seeing these ridiculous headlines concerning Roy and hockey brawl #87585. I've seen worse MLB brawls then this and thats saying alot (Pedro Martinez throwing down a 80+ year old Yankee Manager: Zimmer). People getting all worked up about this must be: a) still angry Roy left the team (for whatever reason pleases them) b) hate violence in sports (you picked the wrong sport to watch) c) hate French people (where I'm from theres plenty of that) d) love to bitch and complain about -everything- (we know who you are) The players/coaches have been suspended and lightly, thus proving that the event was alot less then is being bandied about out in the media. Again I'm reminded of Parliment sitting around and discussing Shane Doans inclusion on Team Canada and I can't help but feel embarrassed for the people involved, what a goddamn waste.

The Teacher's picture
I actually have to agree wih that one. I'm embarrassed that they spent twelve million dollars to hire more language inspectors. That's embarrassing IMMHO. "Give the Habs a 5 minute standing ovation at the end of the last game of the season against the Leafs (winning OR losing)" "Are the Habs ready to pay the Price?"

cautiousoptimist's picture
I've got no problem with fighting in hockey. It's exciting, it's a momentum-changer and it's part of the game. But I do have a problem with this - the poor guy didn't want to fight, had no reason to fight, didn't drop his gloves, and hadn't come within 200 feet of Roy all night. You want to fight, find someone who'll drop the gloves with you. No problem. But don't start swinging at a scrawny little goalie who just came out to stop pucks. www.flickeringpictures.com - not a hockey site, but still kinda neat

The fight was lame, I agree. I've never personally thrown a punch at anyone in my life so I have no idea what these guys are thinking when they are slugging it out, that being said, theres been worse done on the ice before and this kid is young, hes going to pay for what he did. Case closed. Everyone can go back to cheering for the Habs now.

Shane Doan eh????Isn't he the captain on a team coached my the most respected player to ever play the game.....the same team with Tocchett as his assistant coach fresh off his multi season suspension. I couldn't agree with you more but it is a slow day so I'll argue all day with folks who bash Roy over this one...no need to feel sorry....I kind of enjoy it lol.

HABZ24's picture
oh please looks like patrick waved on his son to go attack the other goalie, looked like the son wasnt too interested to do it either, wasnt all upset and nuts looked calm as he skated to other goalie,thats why the opposing goalie didnt defend himself right away he was confused it seemed. which further shows it was patricks doing.neither one have any class and i hope neither one ever make it to the n.h.l a coach or goalie.

Maybe if he had hit the officials (Twice in the same seeason it would be OK??)instead of the opposing goalie all would be forgiven.

The Teacher's picture
Touche! "Give the Habs a 5 minute standing ovation at the end of the last game of the season against the Leafs (winning OR losing)" "Are the Habs ready to pay the Price?"

What absolute nonsense it is to call Maurice Richard a violent psycopath. The Rocket was the most provoked player in the history of the game, a victim of violent abuse, verbal and physical, in every game he played. Sure, he hit an official who was trying to restrain him. It happened when Richard was trying to go after Boston defenceman and former Canadien HalLaycoe while Richard was in a fury and blinded with blood immediately after Laycoe had bashed his stick across his forehead, just missing his eye. He was in a fury because Laycoe had threatened his livelihood, the means by which he supported his family. It sickens me that Maurice's name would be brought up in a discussion of Patrick Roy. There's no comparison. For starters, there was never a player who gave more to his club, who was maore loyal to his club, than Maurice, Roy ran out on the club, and I'll never forgive him that. From what I've read, Red Fisher feels the same way. I won't bother going on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_in_ice_hockey#Longest_suspensions Not violent eh??? Again... I am not criticizing the Rocket as I am a great admirer of both Roy and Richard and anyone else who wins a Cup wearingt he CH.....you'll find me on here defending Patrice Brisebois the same way but read this "A common tactic that teams used to keep him off the score sheet was to simply sucker him into a fight. Richard was not one to back down to anyone, and sometimes he let his anger get the best of him. He was suspended numerous times by NHL President Clarence Campbell for violent slashing penalties and abusive behavior towards referees".

Richard never had a single season in which he even averaged two minutes per game in penalties. If I recall, his highest season total was something like 125 minutes. If he were getting into fights all the time, with a major penalty each time, he'd be way up there in penalty minutes. While he didn't back down from a fight, neither did he seek them. If memory serves, he was suspended three times in an 18-year career. He was hooked, tripped, elbowed, kneed, butt-ended, slashed and you name it on every shift, and referees let that go. Most of the time, Richard restrained himself, for the good of the club. When he didn't, it was because something particularly filthy had been done to him or something that he felt was career-threatening. That hype about Richard being a violent and dirty player came from the likes of that racist martinet Connie Smythe and the English language press outside Montreal.

How many times was he suspended .... I am fairly certain it was more than three and there were ugly stick incidents involved as well. I don't know an exact number I only know tidbits I read in articles and few hockey books I have at home but Richard was widely regarded as one of the most vicious players in the game in his day. This is ridiculous...you are using a very selective memory here Peter. When he was suspended and the riot started it was his second time abusing an official THAT YEAR!!!!Patrick Roy didn't even do anything for certain here ....his son did. Are we blaming him as a coach, a parent or as an alleged provoker. I am glad to you know the workings of the Rockets mind.....he was a hothead.....that is what made him successful....it is what made Roy successful too. Why you prefer to idolize one and victimize the other is beyond me. Let's for a second assume the worst and say Roy did send his son down to fight the other goalie....how was he supposed to know the kid would not fight back and would just turtle? If the other kid ahad cleaned Jonathan's clock would we be talking about this in the same light. This is all ridiculous. You are grasping at straws playing the racism card and saying it is ok to be vicious when provoked. He didn't think about his career being threatened....he is human...and a hockey player...he thought (OUCH!!! you son of a bitch I am going to tear your Fu&*ing head off and reacted ...like most hockey players do....right or wrong it is that simple). It is a violent game...guys play on the edge and sometimes they go over it. Richard went over it far more times then 99.999 percent of hockey players....so be it I still look at him as an alltime great and rightfully so. Roy will be looked at the same way and you will be proven wrong over time....I guarantee it.

No selective memory on my part. I lived the Canadiens during the Fifties. The media remembers only the fights and the suspensions. They don't mention the times Richard restrained himself or the provocations he endured.

I hate to criticize either but Richard became the coach of the Nordiques and quit after 15 days .......gave up on a team tha really was his team....or is it o.k. ofr the coach to quit just not the player. If you read my posts you would understand I am not criticizing Lafleur or Richard merely defending Roy as they are no better if we choose to define them by a few instances. The inscident where he was suspended for hitting an official was actually the second time that season he had done the same thing. Roy is to my genereation what Richard is to yours.....you leave Roy alone and I'll agree to leave the Rocket alone.

Richard quit as coach because he said he found out coaching was not for him. He didn't feel he could do a good job.

Roy quit because he felt the coach had it in in for him (he did) and he could no longer do a good job. I don't like to sit on her knocking one of the greatest Habs of all time but Roy and Richard had a lot more in ocmmon then people think and people are going way overboard as they always do. Roy was no angel...neither was Roy.....I am a Candiens fan not an Angels fan though so it shouldn't matter. Richard was as quick tempered and far more violent then Roy .....if we chose to look at only the negatives for Richard we could find more then with Roy so let's just leave their reputations in tact as hockey players, winners and legends....after all that is all they really are to us.

What Roy Sr. has brought to the sport of hockey and to the Canadiens cannot be denied or diminished. But I wish that he would lose that Tonya Harding (trailer trash) attitude. At the moment the thought of his number and sweater being hoisted up to the rafters among the the pantheon of Canadiens Immortals is akin to hanging dirty laundry in the garden of Eden. Perhaps in the far, far distant future....

J.T.'s picture
I guess there's a reason for the saying "A prophet is never recognized in his own land." And for art only finding value when the painter is dead. Saying his current public image should deny his entry to the pantheon of Canadiens' greats does, in fact, deny and diminish his contribution to the sport and the franchise. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

The Teacher's picture
J.T. Your article on Roy was one of your best. It definitely makes me think. "Give the Habs a 5 minute standing ovation at the end of the last game of the season against the Leafs (winning OR losing)" "Are the Habs ready to pay the Price?"

Corporate's picture
Has anyone looked at the other suspension from the other game??? It was 10 timesmore violent than anything that happened with the Ramparts.. But no one seems to care cause it isn't Roy..

Nah...noone cares because there isn't an opportunity to smear a big name.....just another night at he rink if no big names are involved.

Corporate's picture
very true

J.T.'s picture
Patrick Roy's greatest problem is that his era is too close to us in time. There are very few Habs greats who are perfect...dare I say none of them? But they've had time and myth to soften their rough edges to the point at which all we remember are the stories of triumph and their silent numbers in the rafters. As others point out, if Richard played today he'd likely challenge Pronger as the most-often suspended player of all time. The team would have a hard time covering up Harvey's drinking or Plante's eccentric behaviour. If those guys played in the judgemental spotlight that is Montreal these days, I suspect there would be very few heroes left among them. I'd like to get Red Fisher's take on this. He's seen the Habs heroes of the past for what they really were...warts and all. I wonder if he thinks Patrick Roy is any worse a person than some of them. Roy was a fantastic player with an unpredictable temper. His personality may not have been very well-suited for the role he was often asked to play as the public face of a team. But I think it unfair and unfortunate that a player and a person should be judged solely by his worst flaw. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

Corporate's picture
You do have to admit though that the times have changed quite a bit... Richard has a 9 to 5 job, practices with the team and played games at night... Couldn't picture players doing that today. With that much more responsibility comes a shorter temper. Yes he got suspended, but he was also an icon to french canadiens. I loved Ray for his talent but not his personality. Now, yes he was a big reason why we had 2 cups when he was with us. The difference between Patrick and the rst is that he did not have time to mature and calm down. He coaches like he played. With great passion. It can be good, but as we saw last weekend it can cost him..

J.T.'s picture
Really? I didn't know Maurice Richard had a day job. I knew Beliveau worked for Molson's, but I didn't know about the Rocket. What job did he do outside playing for the Habs? It's true being overworked would shorten a guy's temper. But I think so would being in the spotlight all the time, carrying the French-Canadian star banner in Montreal and being the one expected to lead the team to victory every year without mercy would be pretty stressful all on its own. Roy and Richard seem to be similar types of players in their passion to win at all costs. My point was that Richard's passion and the behaviour it subsequently engendered in the fifties would be under a heck of a lot more scrutiny today...and judged accordingly. As for his personality...I don't know Patrick Roy personally. So I can't argue with you there. I just judge him by what he left on the ice and take the behaviour that gets reported with a large grain of salt, because, as I'm sure is the case with most of us, there's a goodness in there somewhere that doesn't get written up. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

Times have changed indeed....now these guys are under the microscope and the entire world is connected and viewing their slip-ups in a matter of minutes. That is an equally important difference.

Bill H's picture
I have no problem with setting aside the idea of retiring his jersey for another 20 years until we can view his contribution in a more detached and rational manner. Let's take another look at it in 2028. I may very well have forgotten what an *** he is by then.

J.T.'s picture
Is he really an ***? Or have a few stories about a larger-than-life character swelled into a general belief that's actually built on very little? I don't know him. But I find people are generally more complicated than arms-length assessments would indicate. Of course, maybe Patrick Roy acts like an *** sometimes. I'm sure we all do. But I'm not sure it's fair to call him an *** as a general summary of his character. Then again, maybe you know him and have a greater base of experience on which you're basing your opinion. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

Kilgore Trout's picture

J.T.'s picture
I can't see the validity of defending the point by citing an eight-year-old domestic dispute in which no one was hurt and no one charged. I suppose someday people will illustrate what a rotten guy Sheldon Souray is by bringing up *his* wife's call to the police in a domestic complaint that went nowhere. If Patrick Roy was charged with hurting his wife, I could see using this as evidence of his being an ***. But if you're using the example of a man breaking something in anger to illustrate your point, there are a heck of a lot of asses going around out there. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

Bill H's picture
Very well reasoned point J.T. He is a larger than life character. I have never met him and only know him from glimpses through the media, like what we saw recently. The truth is I feel he sacrificed his team for his ego and I have difficulty seeing his jersey in the rafters because of that. Its true that if he had had another dance partner that night, things might have turned out differently. That one incident has coloured the way I see him ever since then. And of course media reports do reinforce that image. As you pointed out, we are too close to the Roy era to properly assess. Or at least I am. Thanks for your excellent post.

J.T.'s picture
I understand how you could have a coloured view of Roy if you believe he chose to leave the team when he did. My own loyalty to a childhood hero is untarnished by the trade because I believe he didn't choose his fate. I think Ronald Corey had already decided to clean house and he believed Roy's time in Montreal was over. I always saw the Detroit incident and Roy's tempestuous reaction as the catalyst Corey was already looking for as a reason to get rid of him. Evidence and logic point more toward that scenario than they do to Roy simply announcing he'd had enough of Montreal. Mangement wanted fans to believe that was the case in order to avoid taking the heat for trading Roy. Judging by the number of fans who are still hurt and betrayed by the Roy trade, it seems to have worked. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

Bill H's picture
Well, clearly Roy Jr is not at fault for skating the length of the ice and pounding the other goalie with his fists. After all, the score was 7-1 and he should have been pulled much earlier. It was clearly the coaches fault. Ironic, isn't it?

Roy Jr....is the backup goalie.

Bill H's picture
Thank you for that correction. It did seem a little too perfect.

Even though its just a game, the fact still remains that one things has made the Canadiens so loved and respected by its fans were the players who played with heart, passion and dignity. All of you know the names as well as I do. But this is just disgusting, and he pretty much gets away with it. I have lost all respect I had left for Roy as a player, and moreover pray they do not retire his jersey.

J.T.'s picture
I'm interested to know how old you are? Because if you grew up with Roy, it would be very difficult to throw away everything he brought to the team and its history so casually. The fight wasn't pretty. But the fact remains, it was a fight in a junior game in the Q. It shouldn't define one of the greatest players who ever wore a Habs uniform. Diminish him as a person, yes, perhaps. But it has no effect on what he accomplished as a Hab. He taught my generation what it feels like to cheer for a Cup winner. That experience is worth a lot to many of us, and we owe him at least a small degree of forgiveness because of that. http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com

24, He made this team great, and gave it a chance to win when they should not have been that strong. He made it entertaining and I doubt im the only one who will remember "the Wink". When I really think about it, the thing that truly infuriates me, is I still feel a little pissed off about how Roy left. I looked up to him, my first Habs jersey had his name and number on the back, and it just killed me to see him go. I have never said anything to diminish him as a hockey player, but to me, the way he left was just infuriating, disappointing and disillusioning, it took me a long time to really get back to that point, where I could say, good for him, he won the Cup. I was damn happy when in 2006 he won the Memorial Cup. I was thinking to myself, maybe one day, he will be back in Montreal, maybe as a goalie coach, or maybe even behind the bench. Then he starts acting like an *** over and over again, he makes you remember that yes while he is human, his ego, his temper and inability to deal with things that he does not like turn him into a ugly, gutless, and often times classless individual. He deserves to be continuously bandied about in the debate for best netminders ever, but the fact remains, and will always remain that when he turned his back on this team, which he did, he took a lot of the greatness and mystique out of himself, and turned him from St. Patrick, into the great goaltender Patrick Roy. He will always be my first favorite player, but he will also always be, in my eyes, the biggest example of professional hockey players who can be arrogant, selfish and petulant people. For a franchise who prides it self on the dignity of men like Bob Gainey and Jean Beliveau, I think it does not do them justice to hang his name beside theres for the rest of the existence of this team. There will never be another #33 in Montreal, at least not in my opinion. But hopefully there will never be Patrick Roy's name and number hanging from the rafters.

RH's picture
Well said.

I see you are referring to Beliveau and Henri Richard...because clearly the Rocket was violent psychopath on the ice right???? Roy certainly never hit an official. Let's unretire the Rocket then...please tell me the difference. If you are willing to unretire the Rocket then I will concede that you may have a point.....Lafleur of course will have to follow.

RH's picture
Re-post from Boone's blog: I don't watch the Q but I would bet double or nothing that Patrick Roy doesn't coach with his old Habs jersey on. He had a stellar career as a Hab and it was unfortunate that his stay ended the way it did. Whether #33 get's retired or not is up to Habs management and they will judge Roy on what he did for the Habs during his tenure in Montreal. What Roy did in Colorado, in my opinion, has no affect on Habs management's final decision. Whatever Roy does as a coach of some junior team, also doesn't have any affect on Habs management's final decision. When Roy got inducted into the Hall of Fame, I was a little irate that he didn't wear a poppy, in remembrance, like all the other inductee's did. A-hole? Yes! But, what he did with his time as a Montreal Canadien has nothing to do with what he's doing now, as a coach or how he carries himself in the public eye. Remember, Ty Cobb is in the Baseball Hall of Fame. O.J. Simpson is still in the Football Hall of Fame, as far as I know. Those jerseys, I assume, have probably been retired by the respective teams they played for because of what they did on the field during there time there. Patrick Roy should be regarded in the same way.

The Hall of Fame and the retired jersey symbolize two different things. The Canadiens do not retire jerseys based on numbers, they do it based on what that person brought to the franchise, and Im sorry to say your wrong when you say the decision will based on what he did as a Canadien. What he did do was disgrace the jersey by the way he left, and moreover his betrayal of the team is what his true legacy as a Canadien is.

RH's picture
The Hall of Fame and retired jersey's symbolize two different things? Really? You're right when you say that the Canadiens organization retires jerseys base on what they brought to the franchise. The Hall of Fame inducts players, journalists and builders based on what they brought to the game. If you replace 'franchise' with 'game', it turns out to be the same thing. Besides, how many Habs players, who've had their jerseys retired, are NOT in the Hall of Fame? As far as your statement about Roy's betrayal of the team, it's funny how ten years of greatness can be erased by a couple of minutes of hot-headedness.

funny, but said couple of minutes had huge ramifications for him, both in image and career, and the team as well.

The Rocket ...wasn't he going to be a coach and then quit.....I guess it was alright ...because he wasn't with us right????? How many athletes have said in the heat of the moment they want to quit.....how many coaches....didn't Toe Blake walk away (I may be wrong but I thought he Quit). I believe his famous quote was that "If I ever swallow defeat I'll quit". I wonder how he would have reacted after his entire team giving up on him in a blowout and the coach TRYING to embarass him.... I guess he would have quit....that was what he said anyway.

coutNY's picture
This whole Bull-Sh#@t thing over a hockey fight offense that his son, a back-up Junior player, committed? This somehow proves because his son flipped and beat-up a kid in Juniors, that Roy Sr. is this Mafia-like monster that ordered the hit? Conspiracy theorist point to his career and tabloid whispers from the lockeroom that he is a loose cannon an embarrasment to the establishment! This media flare-for-the-dramatic smear campaign on a former hockey player that wronged our beloved Habs many moons ago, so as to drum-up support against the movement to his jersey retirement... How do these even correlate is beyond me. Just an opportunity for Roy hatters to say "I told you so..." Get over it, would any other coach be crusified by the media, put threw an criminal investegation, or suspended for an on ice brawl by their players? Do we go after a coach in any other hockey fight by players? Maybe Lefluers should start worrying about his families actions next... He might find himself the first the have his number unretired?

Corporate's picture
I completely disagree with you. Roy has a history of having a temper. So it is clear that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree... Now, how beloved is he... I admit he was a great goalie, but I never liked his personality. At this point in time he would never coach in the NHL. He is too arrogant and he makes fun of too many opposing teams(Coaches and players). It is not a smear campaigne. He brought it upon himself. He has been coach for 2 years and already has 3 or 4 controversies... Did he order the hit?? well from the footage I saw you can see he clearly shrugs his head and encourages the fight. As for Roy Jr. He is a coawrd, hitting a guy that clearly doesn't want a fight... emotion or not that i not right at an level...

coutNY's picture
I didn't see Roy Sr. encourage nor would I assume from the video provides proof from what I saw, that "clearly Shrugs his head and encourages the fight." From what I heard he's had one other controversy not 3 or 4 that involved him actually fighting, and this would not be IMO be his controversy but rather his sons played out through him... The "So it is clear that the apple doesn't fall far from the tree..." statement judges him on a few instances that would not be talked about in normal media channels. Maybe you did not love the guy but I am sure that there a plenty that did. I think Montreal would have many un-inspired fans talking about the 70's Cup years if not for the number #33 were not between the pipes. Seems we would been leaf-like franchise with over a 30 year drought, 2 less cups and few generations without glory. I will not be one to judge his personality from a string of publised instances, since when I didn't know the man off the ice and the good he may have done that was not publisied. How many positive stories does the "bad-guy" get... I rather remember the man behind the mask that did wonders for the Habs... Roy is who I think of as a kid, he's my generation's reason for the Cup being raised and He is the one that I'll tell my kids was reason... rafters or not I don't care.

Corporate's picture
I am only repeating what they showed on RDS last night and it was the top 5 incidences involving Patrick Roy... I am not pulling this out of my bum... And if you read the new posts above, they say exactly the same as moi...

The Rocket punched a referee and was as vicious a player as to have ever played the game....yet somehow he is adored and respected ....I believe the term "fierce competitor" is usually attached to his name. Complete BullS#@t is all this is. Lafleur has had several off ice issues (two significant ones this year). If Roy's jersey doesn't go up then theirs should come down..........I hope you realize I am not saying to pull theirs down but merely raise Roy's to its rightful place. Mats Naslund left us to go home to Sweden while he was still in top form didn't he??.........quitter. Doug Harvey.....not exactly a crystal clear reputation if I recall correctly. Toe Balke obviously could not control his players and 100 percent approved of vigilante justice on the ice......either that or he couldn't control his players.......let's start the smear campaign now. Serge Savard.....is he not supposedly the reason Lafleur packed it in early. Mario Tremblay and Rejean Houle.........the real enemies in all of this .............look no further than those two guys if you want to blame someone for something. Regardless of who you thinkw as right with the Roy/Tremblay thing ....they gave away one of the top three players in the game at the time for a package of nobody's...that was disgraceful and set us back years. Easily more stupid then anything Roy did or didn't do during a typical junior hockey league brawl as a coach. How many coaches or players at the NHL level have never been involved in a brawl or ugly incident.....I will be awaiting the statistics. Great job everyone involved in this fiasco...let's try and find a way to disrespect our past players based on their completely unrelated behaviour because we are all such perfect little angels. I am now writing criticizing some of my favourite Habs of the past to justify the unfair treatment of another LEGEND. This is all very productive isn't it. Let's all put our worst moments out there for the entire world to judge and see how everyone likes us. Garbage......I am completely shocked to see the media for our beloved Habs attacking Roy in such a manner. I don't see enough evidence one way or the other regarding his recent fiasco with his kid but it is still an incident COMPLETELY UNRELATED to his place in the history of the Habs. Obviously they suspended him and found him partly responsible ...so what exactly does that have to do with his time as a Canadien???? Glory, honour, blah, blah, blah.......those terms are terms that in this context reflect the individuals as they behaved for their teams and then only. The blatant hippocracy when referring to guys like Richard and Lafleur who have also had such incidents only highlights the point myself and several others are trying to make......time will tell the story and what will be remembered will be the two incredible Cups that Roy led us to while inspiring a new generation of goalies. I bet the same stuff was written about the Rocket and Lafleur and most of the other greats at some point......the truth is though this bulls&*t will not withstand the test of time......the Cups and Legend that is Patrick Roy will live on.......deal with it. What do Roy's former teammates think of him???????Tell me that....the guys sitting beside him in the locker rooms for those Cups...waht did they think of what Roy did???That is what really matters.....that and the 2 cup rings that are plugging his ears(that's only with Montreal).

Richard was a cultural icon, what he did was stand up for Quebec and that is a large part of why is adored, and the referee was holding his arms back and letting him get punched in the face, not to emotion they ignored all the shots taken at him, and he snapped. Yes, he was vicious but he never did anything that made him a goon, where as sending your own son to beat someone up is probably one of the all time lows for any coach to pull off. Lafleur's incidents involve his own, and have nothing to do with hockey at all, he is doing what he can to protect his family, and quite frankly I would not have done anything differently, choosing between prison and saving your son form that fate is an easy choice for people who care about there families. Savard's actions as GM have nothing to do with why his jersey was retired, if so, you would a Pollock, Blake and Bowman banner. Moreover, Red Fisher has stated several times that the reason that Lafleur left the Habs was because he was not scoring and was growing more and more dissatisfied with his own situation. Quite frankly I don't even know why you mention the Houle/Tremblay blurb because they are not even involved in this debate in any way. To answer your question as to what this debacle has to do with Roy's time as a Canadien, is simple; nothing. But the Jersey benign retired is more than a statement of how great a player was, it was what he did as a member of this team, and how he will be remembered is simple, one of the greatest goalies ever to play the game, a warrior and a champion, also the guy who bailed on his team because his ego was stung and he could not get a long with a coach who felt that no player was bigger than the team.

First of all...when his son is on his team he is a player...no more or no less....or neither would get no respect. Richard standing up for Quebec...then should we start hanging ties for politicans from the rafters too. Roy will be looked at in retrospect as Richard is in time and you can bet on that. Savard...exactly my point his actions as GM have nothing to do with his jersey being retired because it was his time as a player.....think about what you just said please. Several gusy have been held by referees.....I guess Jason Blake shoud have hammered that ref after Downie suckered him.....I guess we could have forgiven Blake if he had done that right?? Lafleur nothing to with hockey????He is a paid ambassador of the team and has been quoted insulting our club on more than one occasion.

coutNY's picture
Hey krob, to be honest I was surprised you'd feel the same about situation as I, but I guess I shouldn't be. Defending the guy that is the #1 reason inspiration for me and possibly thousands of others, for their of love hockey is a no-brainer.

CoutNy ........I am with you on this one all of the way. Athletes are human as are movie stars, musicians, politicians,etc....to think that they are any better as everyday people is foolish. They are all human and a cross section of any group of people is going to reveal different personalities. If you have ever watched a garbage channel called MuchMoreMusic and seen the reality shows of actors and musicians you grew up idolizing you will quickly learn that they are nothing like their images....most of them are idiots I wouldn't allow over to my house for dinner. That doesn't mean they haven't entertained me though or weren't great at what they do. People are people and if we chose to live vicariously through them while they are athletes that is fine....but they are not going to be perfect people. Even Gretzky...the most respected hockey man of all time can be seen "losing his temper" on a nightly basis and cursing and screaming for millions to see at the officials.....this is all crazy....they are people. We must all be angels eh???

moser17's picture
"absorbed a beating with the resignation of an early Christian martyr" lol, yes, J. Roy was persecuting with extreme prejudice

TC's picture
The whole Roy situation has prompted a wealth of excellent articles throughout the cyberworld, many of them disagreeing with Mr. Boone's original post. Clearly a little over 12 years after his departure from the Canadiens Patrick Roy is still a polarizing figure for both the fans and the media. Roy to the Rafters? http://habsloyalist.blogspot.com/2008/03/roy-to-rafters.html The Hockey News Canadiens Blog: Roy deserving of the ultimate honour http://www.thehockeynews.com/articles/14605-Canadiens-Blog-Roy-deserving... Eyes on the Prize: What's the Hurry in Raising Roy's #33? http://wwwrealitycheckeyesontheprize.blogspot.com/2008/03/whats-hurry-in... T.C. tc.denault@habsworld.net