Game 39: Rangers claw back to win in OT

posted by Dave Stubbs at 21h39 EST on Dec 30


0kapnkovy.gif

Captain Alex Kovalev, wearing the C in the flu-bug absence of Saku Koivu, is ridden along the boards by Rangers' Paul Mara.
Bruce Bennett, Getty Images

Lineups | Preview | Game Story | Game Summary | Event Summary | Boxscore | Boone's Blog

The record book won’t show that the Canadiens played shorthanded for 60 minutes tonight, but in a very real sense that was the case in the Habs’ 4-3 overtime loss to the New York Rangers.

Brendan Shanahan, who irked Canadiens fans last season by choosing to sign with New York instead of Montreal as an unrestricted free agent, took advantage of a Roman Hamrlik giveaway to beat Habs goalie Cristobal Huet with a high, glove-hand breakaway shot at 1:06 of overtime to give the Rangers a come-from-behind win.

The 19-man Canadiens – using 17 skaters, 11 up front – wrapped up their six-game road trip, the longest they’ll have this season, with a mark of 3-1-2 and eight points of a possible 12. And given how the club has fared in recent holiday-season sojourns away from the Bell Centre, you’d better believe they’ll happily take it.



With captain Saku Koivu ailing with the flu, the Canadiens earlier in the day called up forward Corey Locke from the Hamilton Bulldogs. Locke arrived at Madison Square Garden with minutes to spare, eager to make his long-anticipated NHL debut. But he too was scratched when his equipment didn’t arrive, forcing coach Guy Carbonneau to dress just 19 players.

It was a eight-point night for the line of Tomas Plekanec (one goal, two assists) between Andrei Kostitsyn (two goals, one assist) and acting captain Alex Kovalev (two assists).

Shots on goal were 21-21, though the Rangers had just one on Huet in the second period.

Twice the Canadiens fought from behind then finally seized the lead late in the second, before New York’s Chris Drury tied the game 3-3 at 14:09 of the third from a scramble in front of Huet.

The Rangers, stoked by their 6-1 rout of the Maple Leafs in Toronto one night earlier, were first on the board in a highly entertaining first period, Dan Girardi threading one past Huet on a long, harmless-looking wrist shot from just inside the blue line at 10:14.

Canadiens’ Andrei Kostitsyn scored the equalizer at 18:03 on the power play, his eighth of the season, when he took a pass in the deep slot from centreman Plekanec and wound up from roughly last week to fire a bullet wrist shot high to the glove side of New York goalie Henrik Lundqvist.

But just 17 seconds later, Rangers captain Jaromir Jagr put the home team back in front, taking a pass from the boards from Scott Gomez to whip one past a surprised Huet.

A less compelling second period picked up great steam in its last six minutes. The Canadiens earned the tying goal, Andrei Kostitsyn again drawing the Habs even, again on the power play, and again on a set-up by Plekanec, though this one came right on Lundqvist’s doorstep, banged in from just a few feet at 14:31.

Then, on a delayed Rangers penalty, defenceman Francis Bouillon did some excellent spadework to begin a huge play, feeding Sergei Kostitsyn, who deftly backhanded the puck to his brother, Andrei, who got it in turn to Plekanec for the latter’s goal at 17:07 – his 12th this season, to go with 20 assists.

Drury’s late goal finally sent the match into overtime.

The Canadiens returned home following the game to enjoy a short New Year’s break, and will open a three-game homestand on Thursday vs. the Tampa Bay Lightning.

Alexander Ovechkin’s Washington Capitals provide the opposition on Saturday, and the no-longer-moribund Chicago Blackhawks wrap it up a week from Tuesday, when the Habs will pay a pre-centennial tribute to another of their Original Six rivals.

 

New York goalie Henrik Lundqvist lunges for the puck, but fails to snare the second-period goal of Canadiens' Tomas Plekanec.
Ray Stubblebine, Reuters

0plekgoal.gif

StumbleUpon

Comments

[Jump to comment form]

Vince is Possible in 2015's picture
Happy New Year's All Hab's fans! I have only been a Habs fan since 86 but I am glad to be able to find this site to finally read fellow Habs views and often asking the same questions I do, be it negative or positive. Will probably be waiting a few more years till my half season of greys come up, until then lovin' HABS INSIDEOUT Looking Forward to Thursday. Will be there chanting. __________________________________________________________________________ "WE WANT VINCE! WE WANT VINCE!"

24 Cups's picture
I've just been sitting here reflecting on the greatest hockey game that was ever played. Thirty-two years ago tonight Montreal and Central Red Army played to a 3-3 draw. (I was 26 years old and the Habs were just about to win four straight Stanley Cups with The Flower blossoming into his prime. I wore #10 as a badge on honour. I can't begin to tell you the pride I felt of having them as my beloved team. Excuse me, I digress) We outshot and dominated them by an amazing margin but Tretiak was unbelievable in goal. Alas, Ken Dryden didn't have his best game as he let in 3 goals on 13 shots. Mind you, when the Soviets took a shot it was always a scoring opportunity. I remember that Shutt and Cournoyer scored for the Habs but I can't remember the third scorer. Might have been Peter or Frank Mahovlich. The one aspect of the 'exhibition contest' that burns in my memory was the intensity level of the game - from start to finish. It was played at an incredible tempo for every second for a full sixty minutes. I know that some of you younger people think that I'm probably exaggerating a little, but trust me, it was like no game I have ever witnessed. I'm sure that older guys like Ian, Scotty, and Dave will back me up on this point. I don't know if it's out on DVD but every true Habs fan must view this historic event at least once. It was the most perfect hockey game in the history of our sport. The Original 24 Cups

Yvon Lambert..... and... there were "no a--holes" at Dorion Suits! :-) Remember that one you baby boomers?

Three of the best games I ever saw, were the finals of the 1987 Canada Cup. The level of hockey on display has never been matched before or since, in my humble opinion.

Hoegarden's picture
Indeed, one of the greatest games ever but cannot forget the end result, a 3-3 tie. At least we did not have shootouts to settle the issue. Tretiak was as hot a goalie as I've ever seen. Playing one of the 5 straigt cups(1956-1960)VHS tapes I have makes me forget the bad weeks our Habs have at times.

Dave Stubbs's picture
I've got the New Year's Eve game on VHS and watch it every couple of seasons. The electricity of the night truly was incredible, but people I know who were there – Red Fisher and Pat Hickey among them – say the hockey itself was less than stellar. Neither of those gents will say it was the greatest game ever played, not even close. But then, coming a few years on the heels of the 1972 Summit Series, and being a game between club and not all-star teams, made this a very, very special event that remains a defining hockey moment for a great many fans.

Dave Stubbs
Habs Inside/Out
Sports Feature Writer, Montreal Gazette

 


HAB-PROFESSOR's picture
I'm late to the show here but I did watch the game. ALL the boys did great on this road trip...ALL...they are making me proud. Last night they had the 2 points in the bag, but 2 errors cost them, 1st PLEK failed to cover his man after the faceoff which resulted in the tieing goal, and 2nd, HAMR made a flimsy pass trying to enter the ranger zone which was intercepted and you have shanahan on a break..Huet not to fault. and maybe Huet would have liked another chance with that first goal which was a harmless wrister from the point. other than those IT WAS A FANTASTIC TEAM EFFORT. KOVY's (the 'C' looked good) line was totally dominating the play as the game summary 'points' out...the other lines had a rotation going because of Locke having his equipment mugged on the subway, and they still played with chemistry, thats a good sign. LATRON was using his weight to crush the opponents who were unfamiliar with that kind of treatment (see Gomez's comments on the habs) and another notable that some specific persons here may have missed: RYDERS NUCLEAR MISSLE SHOT FROM OUTSIDE THE BLUELINE THAT SENT LUINDQUEST TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM AFTER THE GAME FOR A BULLET WOUND TO THE SHOULDER.... NOW THATS THE WEAPON THAT WE HAVE WITH RYDER..WHO ELSE HAS DONE THAT THIS YEAR?????????? thats right, NOBODY. thankyou. --------- 1. until the problem in my picture is solved...we will not be Champions. 2. Delenda Est Torontium.... 3. your not a Hab fan till you watch & UNDERSTAND "The Rocket"

TradeRyder's picture
What would it take for you to change your photo. I get the point - and I think the team is starting to stand up like it should. But I'd rather see Smart Dog's nuclear-accident dog than look at that shot of our captain ducking a punch every day. ____________________________________________________ Too late to trade Ryder now....shoulda listened!

idle's picture
maybe he was just ducking down to gather his upper cut?

I must admit, the 'C' looked good on Kovy. But don't get me wrong, I'm not looking to say goodbye to Koivu.

Hoegarden's picture
Food for thought as we are about to enter 2008; As of today; Habs have the worst record in the league when we lead entering the third period.... 6 losses. We're currently 5th in the line in scoring with no top gunner. Faceoffs; we suck big time, period. Cannot understand that problem with Jarvis and Carbs experience. Drury won 100% of his faceoffs last night. Priority one for sure.

TradeRyder's picture
All great points - all interesting. What's exciting is that those are problems you would think we can solve. Then look out! We really could do some damage if we strengthen our face offs and third period play. ____________________________________________________ Too late to trade Ryder now....shoulda listened!

I fail to see the relationship between size and face-off excellence,.. Drury and Gomez are pint size players,.. not much different was Perreault, the master of them all.

linp's picture
Ian asked us to sit back and watch our team develop. Smart Dog wanted to reserve his right to speak his mind. I prefer Smart Dog's attitude. The more constructive criticism the better, as long as the suggestions are based on facts. Progress can only be made from new ideas. Most of the readers of this site are very knowledgeable. We can judge every post ourself. It would be very boring if everyone just sits back and praises the team all the time.

We are all critical after losses and yes we all reserve the right to speak our minds. I think what Ian Cobb is saying is to keep in mind that you don't win a war without losing battles and every game or slump is not a reason to throw players away or trade them. Progress from new ideas....how about the new lines, the Bulldog influence, Hamrlik, the laughable at the time pick of Carey Price. There is no denying we are moving forward (and faster than expected) and I think Ian just wants people to at least understand (you don't have to agree) what is happening on the larger scale. Smart Dog is a pretty smart Dog but sometimes is not objective with regards to certain issues. He has shown some ability as of late to eat his own words here and there but I don't think Ian or anyone means anything dergoatory towards these sometimes very negative posters. I know I have had days where I look at what I wrote and say damn I must have been ticked. The key is to be able to sit back and watch the team learn from its mistakes. Learn to appreciate the mistakes we make and the corrections and growing that results. I understand somewhat what a lot of the older posters on here are saying when they talk like this (having seen things on a larger scale kids grow up, times change, basically the ups and downs of a team aare no different than the ups and downs of life in general. I am 31 years old but have a seven year old stepson who has helped straighten me out. When you see real progress and the results of positivity and the power of understanding and learning from mistakes (growing pains) it gives you an ability to look at things from a few rows back. Noone wants people to stop donating their two cents worth of constructive criticism but at the same time we all need to understand the big picture. Gainey is not going to magically grab a microphone one day and lay the Habs future out in a press conference but if you look hard enough most of the answers are right in front of us. The organization is undergoing a facelift before our eyes and many are missing out on the importance of some key events in the growth of our collective child ...."The Montreal Canadiens". You can choose to react impulsively to minor occurrences...that is your right but just remember you also have the choice to relish the difficult times and reap the benefits of each lesson learned. We as younger (I don''t know if 31 fits that anymore but...) fans have an opportunity to witness the rebirthing of something really good here and to fret over small things is our nature. To understand bigger things is an ability that not all have so when someone like Ian Cobb points something like that out it is not meant for any other purse but to help us realize the opportunity that is in front of us. We are just fans but we all know we are not just fans and that is the beauty of being a Habs fan. I get so excited everytime a new player gets called up. When I saw O'Byrne get in a fight, Kostitsyn finding his groove, Pleks emerging as a star, Higgins growth, Komisarek, Lapierre learinging a tought lesson, watching Lats grow, Ryder learn to play two ways, Price grow, Huet turn into an all-star, Kovy grow up,etc,etc,etc. It's awesome....in five or ten years when we are a perrennial contender again it will be a great feeling to look back on the days we spent bickering on this site.......but only if you understand it like Ian said. The choice is yours (this was not directed at anyone in particular but I just think Ian's message should be reiterated.

The Teacher's picture
Bravo, Bravo. 100% agreement over here. I can remember Komi in his first season, it's been fun to see him develop into what he is today. And he still hasn't become the force he will be! Isn't it amazing? Being a Habs fan is the greatest pleasure any sports fan can have. I am lucky to have witnessed not one, but two Stanley Cup winners, and One World Cup of Soccer in my life (Italy), and understand in this new world of sports, with 30 teams, you have to build for the long term, continually replenishing your ranks. This is what Gainey and Timmins are doing. -I also note that since Carbo has joined, it is the young players that are responding to him, the older players are the ones who seem to have a hard time adjusting. I'd rather have it this way, and get rid of the older players who don't want to work. -Kovalev had a hump but is working like a devil this year. -Koivu is working, but something seems a bit off, don't know if it's just the illness either. - Dandy had to adjust and become a forward with a role - Samsonov hit the road -Ryder has adjusted his defensive game and is now finding his groove Our defense is awesome - Our goal-tending is SOLID, no matter who plays - Our youth is rising All I know is I feel much better heading into 2008 concerning the Habs then I did in 2007.

TradeRyder's picture
I agree. I've learned a lot from both Ian and Smart Dog... and others of course. What did people used to say - if all we did was praise our team and complain about the refs we'd be like Leafs fans? We live in a passionate city. Vive la difference! If someone has a beef with a certain situation, player, line combination, trend, I think it's interesting to talk about this - fairly, openly, and with facts. Ian's point - to enjoy watching our team get better and not expect perfection is a good one. These are human beings, they play tired, sick, they are always learning. Players get tough breaks - it's typically more worthy of this site (and the people on it) to read "that shot seemed to catch Huet off guard when it was tipped" instead of "Huet sucks! he let in a goal!". ____________________________________________________ Too late to trade Ryder now....shoulda listened!

Bill H's picture
Its great to see Kovalev with the C on his sweater. His superior play is a big part of Canadien’s success this year to date. I read somewhere that a Russian has never been a captain of an NHL team, while there are examples of Swedes, Finns, Czechs and of course Americans on different teams. This was used as a criticism of Russian players and their alleged lack of leadership on NHL teams. Kovalev is proving this theory wrong, even if he does not wear the C permanently. I wonder if he is the first Russian to wear the C on an NHL sweater, temporary or not. Can anyone think of another Russian to wear a C. Fantastic overall effort by the team in NYC. I’ll take the point as it was a solid effort. I didn’t see the game, but from comments here, I believe the effort was there for 60 minutes and in many ways we played a stronger game than we did against TB and the Panthers. I think the collapse in 3rd period last night is part of the same problem we saw with 40 shots against the Panthers. We are going into a defensive shell when we are ahead instead of playing the aggressive game that got us the lead. The strategy worked against the Panthers. It didn’t work against the Rangers. Is this a question of poor execution by the players, or bad strategy by the coach? The prevailing opinion on this board seems to fluxuate from game to game, according to the success of that particular strategy in the previous game. I suspect it is a little bit of both. It is apparent that the team has a problem holding a lead late in the game. They also have a problem fight back when they are behind after one or two periods. We seem to thrive as a team when we are aggressively forechecking and using our speed. I hope the team can overcome these difficulties soon. I think we are on the right track. Imafogdevil and linp re: Negativity I am one of the people who have complained of the negativity in certain posts. I am not in favour of banishing all negativity. But I encourage people to show a little balance in their posts and to cut players and management a little bit of slack instead of quick criticism as soon as something goes wrong. It also seems to me that some posters have an agenda, be it to have Carbo fired, to bench Ryder or have him traded, or to have Huet play over Price, or visa versa. We all have our favourites of course, but I think in these cases, one should consider the team. I cheer for Ryder to break the slump, even though he is the biggest disappointment on the team this year and I think his days are numbered with the club. I cheer for Huet, even though I hope Price soon becomes the best goalie in the league. And I cheer for Price, even though his numbers aren’t yet as good as Huet’s numbers. The bickering and complaining are really tiresome after awhile, especially when it comes from the same posters with the same agenda. Its not just criticism, its over-the-top negativity and scapegoating. Well, on that note, I will wish you all a happy new year. Thank you all for your informative posts. I enjoy the exchange of opinions (mostly) and look forward to the journey we share in the new year.

Read Boones blog "About last night" and JF and I talked about this defensive shell stuff. I am starting to understand ....I hope. We are now at the bottom of the first page so byt he time you read this you may have to use page 1 and 2 but I really think I might be right on this one although I'll admit the frustration is difficult to bear.....let me know what ya think.

Yashin, Zhamnov,Bure???maybe even Federov.

24 Cups's picture
Just because you have a C on your sweater doesn't mean you're worthy of being a captain. All of the players you just mentioned were never worthy of being captains in my book. They were all very talented players in terms of skill but never displayed heart or leadership qualities. (I realize you weren't implying that by listing them but these guys really get my blood boiling. They could have been truly great but were too self-centred to do so) The Original 24 Cups

The Teacher's picture
I'm pretty sure Larionov filled in for Yzerman at some point?

This may spark a hell of a debate or maybe noone cares anymore but I wonder if Yashin could have been a leader had he not played in Ottawa under the microscope in the Toronto vs Ottawa early years. He had a bad playoff and then never recovered. Alfreddson was almost the same and although it is a smaller market Ottawa loves their hockey and magnifies little siuations as good as Montreal or Toronto if you consider scale. Near the end it was clear he just wanted a paycheck but in his early years I really think Yashin did pour his heart out. He couldn't deal with adversity and eventually after everyone else decided he didn't care it appeared to me he just said "why should I care anymore"?. I am not saying it was right I just think that is what happened (similar to Daigle). They lost confidence and I want to be clear I am not absolving them of blame but some people just aren't cut out to be criticized all of the time and they had enormous responsibilities thrust upon them at young ages and crumbled. Not everyone is Sydney Crosby. If either of those guys had been second or third round draft picks than things may have been different. Just my two cents because I liked Yashin in his early years but he just seemed to be whatever he was made out to be.....so did Dagile. I still admire Daigle for coming back as a defensive player despite the fact he was such a flop and had a prima donna attitude in his younger years. As soon as Daigle started getting praised again he folded again. For him I think success was too much for him and he just became full of himself and then his work ethic disappeared.

Hoegarden's picture
Best wishes to all Hab fans out there for a Peaceful, Happy and especially Healthy 2008. Special wishes to our General Mgr, Mr. Bob Gainey. As we all know 2007 has been nothing but a nightmare on the personal level. I often wondered how he could just hang in there and continue to do his job. Our Habs are finally looking like what most of us had hoped for. Youth (11 of our Habs are under 25) and a sense of belonging for many. The puzzle may not be complete but this team is definitely coming together fast. We'll be there for the big dance in April....!!! cheers

I hope one of the reporters that cover the team start asking questions about not having someone available even though Saku had been sick for days and O'Bey obviously was out. This is simply bush league and whoever is responsible should be fined. We must find out who the amateur was and was it another nickle hugging experiment.

habs-13's picture
A little bit of contraversy in that one. I was at La Cage Aux Sports so I wasn't the only one who noticed these. On that tying goal by Drury, there was contact between Avery and Huet, was there not? In any other game that would have been a penalty. To add to that, I watched a Phoenix game a while back where after video review, they disallowed the goal because there was a little bit of contact between Tomas Holmstrom and Tellqvist. The other thing that bothers me, is something that only seems to happen to the Habs. Was there not interference on Kovalev by one of the Ranger's defencemen in overtime when he would have had a clear break away? Interference, holding, something should have been called. And to top it all off, within the next minute, Shanahan get HIS break away and scores the winner. For the Habs there seems to be a formula... Missed Penalty = Goal Against. There was a similar situation last year where in overtime against Boston, I think it was Glen Murray who tripped Ryder in the Boston zone and on the rush going the other way, they score the winnner. We need consistent reffing.

Yes you are right on all accounts, especially the Kovy in overtime interference. On the other hand, Streit is lucky not to have received a penalty (maybe a major) for his hit from behind that led to Kostitsyns first goal. Hamrlik also crushed someone from behind.....so I guess you win some and lose some. We do normally get the short end of the stick it seems but I don't think we were wronged last night anywhere but on the scoreboard. I would like to know what the hell they were doing taking so long on the shot that clearly hit the crossbar and the joint. Anytim something goes to Toronto I get nervous....how in the world was that not a 2 second conversation???

i saw corey locke's name in the game report. what was that about?? didn't know he was called up. Habs played OK last night. didn't necessarily deserve the win, but a decent effort. it's unfortunate, but it's a way of life for a young team. we can never seem to close out the tight ones. huet, as good as he is sometimes, usually isn't a shut down goalie late in the game. it's just who he is. we can't sit back like we did in the third and take only 3 shots. anyway, a well-deserved rest until thursday i believe. but it's time to get things together on home ice. 6 wins through the first half?? yikes. got to be better if we want to be a playoff team.

Ed's picture
Happy New Year to everyone, & to Dave Stubbs who does so much research & contributes so much to this site & to us. Thanks Dave, & please wish Pat & Kevin a Happy New Year. Unfortunately, I will not be able to access this site for a couple of days, & will have to read Dave's latest contribution on Howie Morenz later. I am sure it is very interesting. Happy New Year!

TommyB's picture
You can all take this for what it is worth and draw your own conclusions from it........ This constant pro-Ryder/anti-Ryder thing has become very tedious. In the beginning, it was clearly two sides to a question or situation involving a certain player, and it was both topical and interesting at the time. What it has devolved into, seems to be more of a personal argument between a couple of members of each of the two factions. I now find myself skipping over many posts by these individuals...whose posts in the past I found interesting and informative. I may be missing some good points on things other than Michael Ryder written by these posters, but I'll take that loss because it is just not worth sifting through their favorite arguments. We're into the second half of the season. Ryder is still here. Whether he is going anywhere else, who knows. But to both factions of this Ryder thing, do yourselves a favour.....GET OVER IT!

Don't worry TommyB ....Brisebois is coming back soon lol. I'll have a new crusade.

TommyB's picture
LOL...yeah, and I know you won't be alone!

Smart Dog's picture
It's ridiculous that you can't mention his name without an onslaught. ________________________________________________________________ Be happy! At least the FUTURE looks bright! Plekanec, Higgins, Komi, Chips, Lapierre, O'Byrne, K1 &K2, Price

The Teacher's picture
Cause he SUCKS!

TradeRyder's picture
Post is gone. Pretty funny. ____________________________________________________ Too late to trade Ryder now....shoulda listened!

The Teacher's picture
Hahaha Courny, ahh, made me laugh.

Smart Dog's picture
And you're wondering why your posts get removed? ________________________________________________________________ Be happy! At least the FUTURE looks bright! Plekanec, Higgins, Komi, Chips, Lapierre, O'Byrne, K1 &K2, Price

The Teacher's picture
Yeah, he WAS wondering. Dave told him to read his email. Wonder if he did that either?

Smart Dog's picture
LMAO! (really) That's the most I've laughed in a couple of days. Thanks! ________________________________________________________________ Be happy! At least the FUTURE looks bright! Plekanec, Higgins, Komi, Chips, Lapierre, O'Byrne, K1 &K2, Price

The Teacher's picture
At least Breezer's good for SOMETHING, if only to make smart dog's laugh. ;)

24 Cups's picture
World Junior Update - Canada finished second in their pool and will play Finland on Wednesday. The Russians will play the Czechs. The Original 24 Cups

joe-hab-nuno's picture
We have to stop playing defensive hockey with 1 or 2 goal lead. Do it when we're up 2 when there are maybe 10 min left in the game Or do it maybe with 1 goal lead with 5 min left(maybe). Frustrating to see these teams tie it uo late in the game late. We also have to win a few games coming from behind, i don't think we've won a game this year when we are down after 2 periods.

joe-hab-nuno's picture
Just want to add, Imagine how much higher in the standings we would have been if we didn't try to shut down oppposition so earlt in the third period and let them float around our zone for most of the period.

RetroMikey's picture
Sad to see lose a good game and faltering in the third period but we got 1 point. The kid, Corey Locke will get another chance to play for the team, too bad about the missing equipment being lost. I would like to see Ryder sit out with Dandeneault for the next game we play at home. Steve Begin will have a tough time cracking the lineup when he comes back! Slowly, we are showing results and we will be getting better as the season progresses. We are better off today than we were last year. Let's put Carey Price between the pipes and let our No. 1 goalie Huet have some rest. Way to go Boys! 8 out of 12 points! Especially playing on the road. Now let's snap the jinx and play better at home! Happy New Year to everyone! "We will win the Cup only with Carey Price in the nets"

TradeRyder's picture
I think they'll play better at home. GReat road trip - tough for Locke. I hope we see him play a few games. This young team is like having a big bunch of lottery tickets - so many different players are breaking out. ____________________________________________________ Too late to trade Ryder now....shoulda listened!

Ian G Cobb's picture
I sure hope in the new year some of you people start to understand the team concept and what it takes to become a championship hockey club. Every day some of you are on someones back for not doing what you think they should or should not. I have been around hockey in diferent capacities for over 50 years, i sure don't know it all, but I do know what it takes to win championships. The first thing is stay the course when you have been there and your critics have never. Every winning club has balance, scoring for instence, that people are transfixed about. A winning club has many 15 goal scorers, and a couple of 25 goal scorers. Not 3, 30 goal scorers for example. If you check back in our history of cup winners and contenders you will see what i mean. Some great players on winning teams never scored more than 10 in a year, and on D some only got 1 or 2 in a year. But they played team hockey not individual stardom hockey. The development of this kind of chemistry takes years not months. I'm telling you that for the first time in decades we have a G.M. that has been there and will not waiver from the program. Two more years my friends and we will be at the top of this profession. Stop riding and talking trade of our players, they are very valuble assets even if you can't understand there roll on this club. So this new year why not sit back and enjoy the fantastic ride of development to the top. I have not enjoyed this franchise as much as i do now, in very many dismal years of poor management. It is not as much fun winning the cup, if you don,t understand how we got there. It won't be to long now, stay positive and watch each game for suttle improvments and you will be as excited for every game as i am ENJOY 2008 IAN

Big Bird's picture
Great post Ian. One of the best of 2007 by far in my opinion.

The Teacher's picture
Thank you Ian, I have tried to remain positive in spite of the lack of effort I have seen on some nights. i don't mind rookies making mistakes, it is just effort from veterans, when it is not there I go crazy. We have a young team that is learning together and growing under the tutelage of not one, not 2, but 4 Stanley Cup winners (Carbo, Gainey, Muller, Jarvis). I trust them to bring back the glory of the Habs. Gainey is not trying to build a team for one year. He is trying to build a team for many. When you are doing that, it is wise to be patient. A happy New Year to you and all.

TommyB's picture
Hi Ian, Hope you and Andree' had a great Christmas, and I wish you both a very Happy New Year. I hope we can meet again some time in 2008. I really enjoyed your latest post and agree with you wholeheartedly, especially your line near the end... ..."It is not as much fun winning the cup, if you don,t understand how we got there"... Truer words have never been spoken. I guess it's not really the fault of the younger posters here, (who only have the last 15 years or less to draw on for their knowledge base of just what once was, what happened in between, and how we are going about restoring a glorious franchise to at least some resemblance of what it was), for their lack of patience. You have a good handle on it, Ian. Keep on sending "the message" throughout 2008.

Ian G Cobb's picture
Hi Tommy, and the very best to you and family! Now i know the advantage of being an old fart. Just reading some of the younger peoples post,s remindes me how little i knew 30 or 40 years ago. No one could tell me then either.

Great points Ian.... I think. I haven't quite finished yet so I printed the screen and will continue this novel you have written on my lunch hour lol. Welcome to the "let it all out" club.

24 Cups's picture
Krob also has some great posts on Mike Boone's blog under the title "About last night..." Rumour has it that Krob is also in line to write the eighth instalment of Harry Potter:-) Hell, I have to clean my glasses halfway through some of his posts!!! All kidding aside, Krob is the Koivu of HabsInside/Out. A job well done. The Original 24 Cups

Arghh!!! Harry Potter!!! If only you knew how many hours my television has sacrificed to that darn Potter. I have regrettably seen every movie except the most recent (this Friday the little man already has it preselected for movie night) several times. We always read to our little guy every night and I will say that he now reads Harry Potter books on his own during reading time at school so I guess they aren't all bad. They sure aren't Star Wars though.

Ian.... true words of wisdom! I am sure the majority of HIO folks agree. All the best.

Smart Dog's picture
I agree with you Ian. I see that chemistry happening all through the team. It's not good to tilt at windmills... or to criticize our two very good goalies for losing when they are the ones who save our butts most nights, or players for fanning on shots, or missing a pass. But I do reserve the right to speak my mind if there is a player who I think is not working hard or doesn't fit with where I see the team going. I also reserve the right to be wrong - we all have the right. If I am we will see... my words are out there; I'm happy to be stand by them and will admit if I am wrong. But I'm not wrong yet. All the best! ________________________________________________________________ Be happy! At least the FUTURE looks bright! Plekanec, Higgins, Komi, Chips, Lapierre, O'Byrne, K1 &K2, Price

Ed's picture
Below are just 2 of the negative comments made about Ryder's play last night. The first one was by TradeRyder & the second by Smart Dog. See where TradeRyder says Ryder was a waste of a sweater, & Smart Dog says he was the one wasted sweater. Fortunately, a lot of fans disagree with those two, & even Mike Boone today has some praise for Ryder's play last night, & any one who follows this sight knows that Mr. Boone has never been a supporter of Ryder. Far from it, right Mr. Boone. At least Mike Boone can be objective in his assessment, unlike TradeRyder & Smart Dog, who dislike the guy so much, it seems to bother them. First we have TradeRyder's quote: "Submitted by TradeRyder on Sun, 12/30/2007 - 22:41. As someone said below - tonight Ryder was a waste of a sweater. And not just tonight. And Nfld (I have actually been there) ROCKS!! So do Newfoundlanders! But anyone who says we're picking on Newfoundlanders because we're disappointed in Ryder's season and his play has rocks in his head. That's all there is to say about that." Next we have Smart Dog's quote: "Submitted by Smart Dog on Sun, 12/30/2007 - 22:05. Observations on NY: 1. Mixed reviews - we lost in a NY minute! Huet as much as he is a great goalie, is not good in overtime, not good on shoot-outs. He seems spooked. I repeat - still a fantastic goalie... but when we go to overtime, I'd bet on the loss. 2. Plekanic the Mekanic. What a player he's becoming. The guy makes his line run like a top. Our best player tonight, and to me, our brightest rising star. 3. Higgins, Kostitsyn, Kovalev - all stars tonight... our forward lines are starting to be able to control the play. And on D - hats off to Boulon who played like he was 7 feet tall. 4. Ryder...sigh... He must like the TV show Lost. That's how he looked. I know the final goal was largely Hamrlik's mistake - but that Ryder was in on the play and I think fumbled the puck just before is no surprise. Several times he was drifting around the neutral zone, not back-checking, just waiting for his break-away pass. I used to be neutral on Ryder - sometimes he gives it. Tonight he was the one wasted sweater. Sit him. Trade him. Get rid of him. All you newfs, go ahead give me your best shot." Now here we have Mr. Boone this morning praising Ryder's 2 way play last night. "About last night ... posted by Mike Boone at 9h00 EST on Dec 31 Wait'll next year! It used to be the eternal plaintive cry of long-suffering Brooklyn Dodgers fans. But in Montreal, we can say it with a bit more conviction. There won't be a Stanley Cup parade in 2008, but Canadiens are on the come. They're young, they're talented and they're going to get better. Exhibit A: Last night's game. Down a defenceman, lacking their captain, dressing only 17 skaters and facing a hot team and a well-rested goaltender, Canadiens took it to the Rangers for 54 minutes. Had Tomas Plekanec and Alex Kovalev – who were brilliant, along with linemate Andrei Kostitsyn – cashed a third-period 2-on-1, the Canadiens would have won in regulation. As it was, they got a very well-deserved point to complete an outstanding 3-0-2 road trip. There are many positives: • Michael Ryder didn't score but played his best two-way game of the season." My wish for the New Year is that those 2 posters try to be more objective, but unfortunately, I know this won't happen.

kevin m's picture
The team had a very successful 3-1-2 road trip. Sorry, but I'm still trying to digest that humiliating loss to Dallas.

Smart Dog's picture
On the positive side, that might have been the rock bottom that we sprang back up from. But it's unfortunate we won't play them again this year. ________________________________________________________________ Be happy! At least the FUTURE looks bright! Plekanec, Higgins, Komi, Chips, Lapierre, O'Byrne, K1 &K2, Price

kevin m's picture
I was happy to hear Gomez After the game last night, being interviewed by Luc Gelinas of RDS, commenting that this was perhaps the best team that they had faced this year!!!!

There is one way we could play them again this year!

Smart Dog's picture
Wouldn't that be sweet!! I'd love to see Komiserik get a few opportunities to sandwich Ribeiro into the boards. ________________________________________________________________ Be happy! At least the FUTURE looks bright! Plekanec, Higgins, Komi, Chips, Lapierre, O'Byrne, K1 &K2, Price

Smart Dog's picture
I think your wish for the season is that everyone will agree with you. Keep wishing. No, I don't agree that Ryder had a great game. He had an okay game - did some good things and some bad ones. My overall feeling about him is that he can't play a two-way game and score. He only scores when he's standing in front of the net and fed a thousand pucks. I'm not sure what your quote above by Trade Ryder is even about... Anywya, see my reply below to your point about my ONE point error. When I said he led the team for two years in the minus department, I did not look it up (my error) but was going from memory and in fact I was exactly one point off (one year). I have not criticized Ryder that much before. But yes, I think he's a waste of a sweater. My patience has run out. That's my opinion and there certainly are facts to suggest I may be right. No-one knows. Unless you have a direct line to God, let's wait and see. ________________________________________________________________ Be happy! At least the FUTURE looks bright! Plekanec, Higgins, Komi, Chips, Lapierre, O'Byrne, K1 &K2, Price

It was really apparent to me how the team misses the big body presence of o,byrne on the point.He would have made a big difference in our defensive zone coverage. We are playoff bound if the team continues with its hustle,Happy New Year.

Habs had a great game last night. There were a couple of mistakes and at least one soft goal, but all in all the guys played an excellent and very entertaining game. I am very optimistic about this team. What a beauty set-up and goal by the two Kostis and Pleks! Kovalev is great this year and I am happy that he was wearing the 'C' last night. He is a leader and is helping the young guys along. I am also pleased with the way Ryder is coming along... his line is dangerous and has to be a concern to opponents. Its hard to deal with 3 solid attack lines shift after shift, and a fourth line that can shut you down, bug you, hurt you and also put the puck in the net. Too bad for Locke, I hope he gets to play if Koivu isn't back for the next game. I also hope that Markov is not out for too long... that could be very bad news, but lets stay positive....Bouillon is back to his old reliable self, so thats very good news. In my humble opinion, Habs don't need a big trade to wake the team up. All of the components are there and they appear to be coming together nicely. Kudos to Carbo for his latest match-ups. At this point, time and patience is all that is needed. By the looks of it we won't have to wait too much longer. Hang in there Habs Fans....there is light at the end of the tunnel... and no, its not a freight train! Happy New Year to all of you

Markov is hurt??? I saw him get hurt and wincing on the bench but then he went back out (I thought he was just going to test his skating and he just played) and kept playing his usual solid game. Is he actually hurt (going to miss time). Habby New Year to you too Scotty90 and to all with tricolored blood.

Hi Krob, notes and news from my Yahoo Fantasy Hockey Pool: "Dec 31 Markov limped off the ice midway through the final period after blocking a shot with his left leg on Sunday at Madison Square Garden. He did return. Markov logged 25 minutes, 32 seconds of ice time in the game. The defenseman is considered day-to-day." All the best to you and your family. Oh, by the way, Mama Mia was great on Friday.... but it sounds like I also missed a great game :-(

24 Cups's picture
'We Will Rock You' is your next night out. A fabulous time. Check the Habs schedule before you buy your tickets! The Original 24 Cups

I bet his ankle swelled up like a grapefruit after he took his skate off but I'd be surprised if he missed time if they are saying day to day (that usauly means bruising and swelling). Glad you had a good time (knew you would)and yeah you did miss a heck of a game. It was everything I hoped for that day when we were writing about it. Some guys got involved physically (unfortunately O'Byrne got hurt) and Ryder scored. Huet got a taste of back to back action again and every line was effective. It was a lot like last night but with the big cushion we had early we eventually sat back and that is what led to the being outshot.

Ian G Cobb's picture
krob1000-- Great read, only problem is that by the time i read it all, its nearly next year!! Just having fun with you.

At least I use paragraphs now (not properly I might add)!!lol.

Ed's picture
"Submitted by Smart Dog on Sun, 12/30/2007 - 23:13. If you believe that plus-minus has meaning - at least at the high end low ends (and I do) the concern about Ryder's play is that even with more goals he may not be a keeper. Remember Souray... we loved the goals, but chewed our nails off watching him defend. Ryder to me is the same. Thirty goals is alot, but being on the ice for more goals against than any other forward two years in a row is a concern. Especially with our depth, he's not just a distraction, he's of questionable value." Well, Smart Dog, even though Ryder has had 2 bad years in a row in the +/-, he was not the worst forward 2 years in a row. In 2005-06, he was tied with Dagenais at -5, & Ribeiro and Sundstrom were at -6. If you are such a "Smart Dog", you should be able to do a bit of research & stop using untrue figures to justify your agenda. In 2003-04, Brisebois was the best player at +17; Ribeiro & Dagenais +15; Jim Dowd +12; Quintal & Ryder +10. What happened to change Ribeiro & Ryder in such a short time? And where have all those players gone? I can't answer the former question, but I do know the answer to the latter. In 2006-07, Ryder was the worst forward at -25. However, don't forget +/- was a team problem & there was Koivu -21; Latendresse -20; and Kovalev -19. There were only 4 forwards with +'s: Perezhogin, Plekanec, Johnson & Kostitsyn. Two of those are now gone. You should give up on constantly criticizing Ryder because it will only be a matter of time before he is gone. It will probably be before the trade deadline. However, when you do criticize, be sure you don't mislead people with untruths. ________________________________________________________________ http://www.nhl.com/nhlstats/app?fetchKey=20042MONSASAll&page=Stats&servi...

Smart Dog's picture
So your defense of Ryder is that one of those two years he wasn't the minus leader, he was a whole ONE POINT AWAY FROM BEING the minus leader on the team. LOL Sorry... I obviously am TOTALLY wrong about him then. I deeply apologize for my terrible one point error. Worst and one point from worst, well that's a lot different. You mention that Kovalev and Koivu had bad years one of those years (though not as bad as Ryder). They did - players sometimes have an off year, but Ryder is the only one who's plus-minus came near leading the team both years... and add to that he's not putting up good numbers in other areas this year. You want to talk specific numbers - in 2006-2007 Ryder was THIRTY-FIVE points off from the PLUS leader: Perezhogin +11 Plekanic +10 Ryder -24 (team leader!) So thanks for helping me make my case. Loyalty is good - I respect yours. But at this level I want players with a complete game. This is the third year running that Ryder has not brought that. With the talent we have, I see no need to keep someone that with his negatives. It's not personal. Not for me anyway. I just have a Souray like reaction to him. Good guy - belongs someplace else. He won't score 30 again - he only does that if he's fed a million pucks while standing in front of the net. And he seems to have even lost that trick this year. ________________________________________________________________ Be happy! At least the FUTURE looks bright! Plekanec, Higgins, Komi, Chips, Lapierre, O'Byrne, K1 &K2, Price

TradeRyder's picture
When you lose your groove, you lose your groove. It would be great if Ryder could get his back, but his numbers, as you say are not promising. Gainey believes in him still... or so he says... we'll see if he's here in April. ____________________________________________________ Too late to trade Ryder now....shoulda listened!

What a road trip!!! This team seems to have found new life in new legs and we as fans are the beneficiaries of a faster more entertaining brand of hockey (until we lead in the third). Last night was a better effort as a whole than either of the Florida or Tampa games and despite the outcome I was as happy after that one as one could be given the outcome. Lets start with all of the positives. All 11 forwards played solid games. The trio of Pleks, Kovy and Kostitsyn was incredible. Easily the best single game performance by any line on the Habs this year. It would have been nice if they had buried one of those other chances in the third for an insurance marker but I cannot complain given their play. They moved the puck with ease and they never stopped skating. Kovalev looked 25 years old and really seems energized playing with those two (I have stated that breaking them up may strengthen us but after seeing HIggins and Ryder together I like things the way they are and bow to Carbo's supreme intelligence). Ryder, Higgins and Lapierre is a stroke of genius (I admit I thought it was dumb to keep Higgins and Ryder together at first...I was wrong). Ryder looks rejuvenated and Higgins seems to thrive on the responsibility of being the best player on a line. Lapierre is a perfect fit and his demotion this year really woke him up because from an effort perspective he has been unmatched since his call up. Those people out there saying Ryder looked lost last night really don't understand hockey (I mean that). He plaed great and aside from the Kovy line he was the best forward. He made several great rushes, nearly separated Lundqvist's shoulder with a clapper from the blueline, was agressive,actually won several one on one battles and was the BEST backchecker we had. He twice made incredible opportunity saving defensive plays and also stopped a couple others before a play really had developed. Chips, Kosty jr. and Chips were not spectacular nor were they noticeably outplayed at any point. Sergei once again demonstrated the benefits of having eyes in the back of his head with a slick drop pass to his brother before Andrei fed Pleks in perhaps the Habs prettiest goal of the season. Lats had his usual (and more frequent as of late) dominant moments along the boards and went hard to the net. They definitely missed Koivu offensively but Chips held his own from a defensive perspective. Dandy and Kosto did what they do....they hustled, hit and killed time while the other guys got rested. They kept it really simple and I think had a very strong forechecking game (in their limited ice time). The defence also played very well. Hamrlik made two mistakes on the night and got burned on both. Dave Reid did an interesting breakdown of the tying goal and showed how both Hamrlik and Pleks got beat to the net off that draw and that is why the goal was scored. Bouillon, Gorges and Komi all played well. Markov did not have one of his best games but was still solid and Streit did a great job easily transforming back into a defenseman (Carbio is looking smarter every game). Huet did not play poorly atall and in fact made some very big saves. The Shanahan shot was perfect and I would go as far to say that 1 out of 30 goalies might stop that shot (and that is overestimating I believe). Now for the negatives......faceoffs. We were not good on the draws and it led to our ultimate demise. I am not sure how this can be rectified as we are not going to trade a center. I guess these guys should take a summer hockey school with Yanic Perreault....they know they need to work on it and I believe they do....they just get beat. The other negative is the two non calls on Hamrlik and Streit on hits from behind that went uncalled. We got lucky (yes, I know the refs let a lot go) but those are penalties 9 out of ten times (maybe even a major on Streit's) and they could have been costly. I lied. One more negative.....to who ever is responsible for getting a call up and his equipment to the arena on time. I would figure with the amount of money that these guys are worth that they could get their equipment there. This was a kid who has been buried in the minors for years and this was his shot. Some idiot at an airport (or wherever it was) may have cost this kid his career. If Koivu returns (he probably will) he will probably not get his chance again with us as he is a ways down the depth chart and Grabs happens to be hurting. I hope he does and I was excited for him and I felt like it was my equipment that was lost. I really did feel that bad for the kid. Like I said before though....What a road trip!!

Yes - a very good road trip but we can't squander opportunities like we had last night. Faceoffs did hurt us. But what really killed us was going into this ridiculous defensive shell with 10 minutes left in the 3rd period - especially against a team with Jagr, Shanahan, Stracha, Drury & Gomez. With the standings so close we needed those 2 points last night and should have had them. Rangers are now only 1 point behind us for fourth. They could have been 4 points behind. We have given up probably 10 - 12 points this year on blown leads by playing this stupid fall back behind our blue line and just let the opposition pound away strategy. Why not play the last ten minutes like they played the first 50? We only missed the playoffs by a few points last year and the way the teams are bunched up this year again, it may be one or two points that makes the difference again. I would hate to look back on last night at the end of March and think - wish we could have buried the Rangers that game.

Bill H's picture
I agree with your negatives krob1000. The faceoffs are a big problem. No doubt aggrevated last night by the absence of Koivu. I would hope the coaching staff are aware and are working on it with the offending centres. I didn't see the game, as I am stranded in Laffland. But the stats don't lie. I believe that this may be part of a broader issue that is being debated on these pages and I will comment further in a later post. Too bad about Locke's equipment. Hopefully he'll get another shot at it. I don't know that a one game call-up is going to do it though. Just about anyone coming up from Hamilton is going to need an adjustment period to find his game. I don't want to wish an injury on anyone, but that is what it is going to take for Locke to get the chance he needs. The only other way is if he is part of a trade package. krob1000, thanks for your intelligent analysis. I look forward to it as it is always well thought out with balance between positive and negative.

Ed's picture
krob, you do the best analyses of anybody on here. I don't know how you notice all those things. You must be very analytical, or a scout. :) Keep up the good work, & I feel the same way about poor Cory Locke. He might never get that chance again with the Canadiens. Imagine if 2 or 3 players came down with the flu. Someone missed the ball on this one.

habfan53's picture
Hey Flower. Do you think we went into a defensive shell in the third because we started a man down for 2minutes, or because it was our third game in four nigths or we we're down a forward who plays a regular shift, kills penalties and is used on the power play. Despite being in the shell we had had our chances a couple of odd man rushes and a couple of hit posts. The guys played well, The game was entertaining and we are not going to win them all anyway.

The Cat's picture
Happy new year everyone. I dont get the criticism Kovalev is getting from some of you, just cause of a few mistakes. I know hes been tricky in past years but not this year. Without him we'd hardly be competitive. He's the only one on our team that can do some magic and put fear into the opponent when he has the puck. Ive said it, Ill say it again: Give him more ice and the green light to do as he wishes. He has a goaltender's mentality, he needs to feel that he's the go-to guy to be the best he can. He has to be treated the same way Demers used to treat Roy. Demers hardly ever criticized Roy.

G-Man's picture
Happy New Year to Mr. Stubbs and Mr. Mio for helping make HIO the best Habs site anywhere. All the best for you and your families for 2008! Gilbert

imafogdevil's picture
Happy New Year to all, I believe that we all need to make New Year's resolutions. Here are some for all of us who read and post to this site. 1. That we will support the Habs. That includes ALL the players who wear the Bleu, Blanc et Rouge! 2. That we will refrain from personal attacks on this site. That includes personal attacks on both Players and Posters. Name calling and inappropriate comments are included in this. Everyone has an opinion, but think before you post any comments that might be seen as offensive to a person or group of people. If you aren't sure if it is offensive or not, it probably is. 3. That we will cheer for any team who plays the Leafs, and to a lesser extent, the Bruins. And when they play each other, we'll just ignore it like it never happened. Go Habs! Each and every Hab, not just some, ALL!! Les Habs sont la!

linp's picture
Just finished reading the posts. There are lots of passionate Habs fans. That's why I am posting on this site. My personal opinion would be: after each win or loss, it is constructive to point out the area we did well and also the area we need to improve. Some posters said that we should not said anything negative. It would not be very helpful if everyone just says yes. The last game has given the team and the fans quite a bit of information to think about. The way the team played in the 2nd period. The chemistry of the 2nd line. The play of the youngsters with no fear of those big name opponents. We have something really excellent to build on. Why with the same players the game turned around completely in the 3rd period? The same happened in the previous game after we have built up a big lead in the first 6 minutes and then gave up 40 shots on goal. How can our team improve on this? With that I wish all the Habs fans a happy New Year 2008.

TradeRyder's picture
Bouleau Noir, P Saint Pierre - I agree with you both. The team gets stronger and stronger. Some of these young players are fun to watch. The Mekanic has been my favorite all year and he and K1 have a great chemistry... you can count on them to get the puck through traffic to each other while Kovalev is doing a great job getting the puck through as well. More solid at the back too with the young defensemen coming around. The Flower has a point too. The team has shown they can score 5,6,7 goals a game. Instead of falling into a shell, they need to keep the pressure on other teams once they get them running. NY got ONE shot in the second period - WOW! For me the main question besides that is do we still have 3 scoring lines. With Koivu in we know we have two. Let's hope so. Gomez from NY said that the Habs were "one of the hardest teams" they'd had to play against. We have to be quite pleased about that - the team is starting to score more goals, win more games, and gel enough that other teams are not looking forward to us rolling into town. How long have we waited for that!! Ole! Ole! ____________________________________________________ Too late to trade Ryder now....shoulda listened!

A great hochey game and one of the best played by our team this year,.. they are signs that this team is growing into a better team as the season proceed while the collecting of 8 points of a possible 12 is a reassuring way to exit year 07. I like the fact that we are entering the new year standing 3th in the East in points,.. even thought its only 6 points above the Panthers sitting at 12th,.. but more important is that our 5-on-5 scoring as improved since the arrival of Sergei, Lapierre and O'Byrne and that our scoring average as moved up from 2.6 to 3.5 goals per game since then. The latest addition to our roster has given the team the extra scorind depth its lines needed in order to play a more offensivelly commited game than they had thus far,... the two beautifully executed tic-tac-to pieces that lead to the Kots and Pleks goals tonight are testament to the increased offensive know how of our team and I believe that we entering the new year offensivelly wealthier than we have been in quite a while.

P St. Pierre's picture
I thought the Canadiens played a very solid game tonight, despite the absence of Saku Koivu. I hope he gets over his flu quickly and that it doesn't spread to any of the other players. The Plekanec line is really something to watch. Those three guys have tons of skill and they know how to read each other. Tomas Plekanec is like a hidden gem that other teams just haven't found out about yet. He is strong at both ends of the ice and his vision and creativity, combined with his hustle make him a very dangerous forward. He is by far one of my favorite Habs and his play this year has been outstanding. Andrei Kostitsyn has a tremendous shot, and his work ethic has steadily improved since the beginning of the season. I can definantly see him becoming a very good winger for the Canadiens for (hopefully) a very long time. While Andrei Markov continues to be (in my opinion) the best player on the team, Alex Kovalev has certainly made his presence felt this season. He's not making waves with Carbonneau, he's consistently producing goals and points, and he's been a good team player. His skills are so incredible that you know other guys on the team are looking for him to lead them, and this year he's done a fantastic job of it. I seriously doubt that Kovy would have been selected to wear the C last year in any games that Koivu missed. The fact that Carbonneau chose him to wear it tonight speaks to the steadying influence he's been this season.

Well said, P St. Pierre. Kovalev's turn around has been a key factor in the team's success this year. On the PP, the PK, back checking, throwing hits, leading the team in scoring ... And Markov gutting it out after taking a slapshot in the foot! And, although I have consistently advocated here trading Ryder, some good work last night from him too. Although a short bench and 3 games in 4 nights were no doubt a factor, I just wish we could protect a lead just a bit better. Still, one of the best games I've seen in a while.

theflower's picture
I blame tonights loss on Guy Carbonneau! Going into a defensive shell after owning the game for long periods has to be about the dumbest thing a coach can do to his team. It turned the momentum around for the Rangers who really were out of it in my opinion. Carbo has to realise this is not the 80's or 90's anymore. Teams are coming back from 2, 3 or even more down in the third period in todays' NHL. Honestly it was an absolute travesty to watch that. I kept saying to myself, so when is New York going to score, its just a matter of time and sure enough blammo! 100% the fault of coaching what an awful way to lose after playing a strong game!

HUMM,.. to much blame and not enought credit given to the Rangers and their goaly.

theflower's picture
Trust me I am not discrediting the Rangers ability to play well and beat us. I did however watch the game, as I have watched every single Habs game this year. We have a habit of going into defensive shell mode if we have a lead and that comes from the coach. Trust me if you watched and heard the MSG announcers continually shaking their heads and wondering why we went into defensive mode so early into the 3rd period, they saw the same thing I saw. They too felt it could only lead to trouble for Montreal and clearly they, as am I were bang on!

G-Man's picture
Huet disappearing when Shanahan was sent in alone cost the Habs 1 point. He needs to practise shootouts because he turns into a sieve every time. That being said, the Habs played very well despite being short-handed. Did you think they would come back after getting down early? I saw a great effort with amazing passing among the 3 on the PKK line. I also saw a talented Rangers team led by Jagr, Gomez and Shanahan, who match up pretty much with the elite of the NHL. Blame the coach if you want to (that's the easy way out, not making players responsible for their play), but the Habs, coaches and all, have turned a corner that you will witness beginning with the next game. With 3 lines for the other teams to worry about and more room for the shooters, success and adulation will not be far behind. Gilbert




Ê